A Good Day & More Than a Little Disruption

This picture has nothing to do with the conference, except that it is in the lobby of the Hyatt Regency, and it is absolutely mesmerizing.

I may have admitted to my readers before, the apprehension I was felling about keynoting the Central States Conference for the Teaching of Foreign Languages.  No need.  What a hospitable group of people, and a much larger turnout than I had expected.  My message on a flattening world, flattening information landscape, and flattening classrooms seemed to resonate quite well with them, and they were so very welcoming to this mono-lingual lug.  I also did sessions on blogging and podcasting, merely leading up to Apple gal Janet Hills much richer presentation on podcasting.  She’s a real geekster gadgeteer who puts on a very impressive show.  I did leave her envying me and my new Logitech wireless remote — with volume control. 😉 Later in the day, I sat in on Tom Welch’s presentation, Language Learning in a Flat World.  Welsh is a consultant from Kentucky and is doing a lot of work on 21st century skills, and doing some work in my own state.  He use to be a French teacher, so he definitely knew the lingo and the buttons.  Welsh started off with Karl Fisch’s Did You Know? video and then talked about how KFCs in China are out selling Mcdonalds.  The reason?  KFC has adapted their menu to appeal to the Chinese pallet.  I heard exactly the same thing in New Zealand, that KFC stores  have an architecture that is designed to appeal to the Maori and other Polynesian cultures.  This is also being blamed for increased obesity among Maoris. Welch also predicts a coming tsunami in education.  He attributes it to three already established and emerging factors:

  1. The identification of standards (an agreement on the “product”)
  2. The use of common end of course assessments (quality guarantee)
  3. Technology (oportunities for learning 24/7/7 – on demand learning)

Because of my well published predisposition against standards-based education and high-stakes testing, and any emphasis on technology (for technology’s sake), I almost disregarded this list altogether and and quite nearly deleted it right after I typed it into my notes.  However, I continued to listen. As it seems, there is one more factor, that when stirred into this cauldron, could quite easily transform this concoction into something apocalypticly disruptive to the business of education.  Simply erase the Carnegie Unit, the unit of measure for American education, and kaboom. I didn’t get this at first, but as Tom continued to talk, it suddenly rushed over me like a fever.  When a principal is confronted with a group of students who need to learn organic chemistry, and she are thinking of the situation in terms of standards of knowledge and skill to be attained to a specific measurable degree, then the answer is not necessarily an automatic, “I need to find a chemistry teacher.”  The answer is, how am I going to cause that learning to take place, and her options extend well beyond just hiring a teacher.  I’m not jumping up and down with joy over this.  I haven’t rolled the stone around enough.  I suspect that I am going to have mixed feelings.  But I must admit that on of the products that I was especially interested in, in the exhibitor’s hall, was a service where you can hire a teacher in Peru to teach you Spanish via the Internet for $15 an hour. It’s got me scratching my head!

4 thoughts on “A Good Day & More Than a Little Disruption”

  1. i agree about the carnegie unit. when you look at the european model that decides on how much time the students need to acquire new skills and basic needs, it changes everything. teachers all too often complain about scheduling because time constraints affect pedagogy and pedagogy varies from content to content.

    a three hour a day schedule would kill my course, but one hour five days a week would be a godsend. which is where i agree with tom’s message. instead of asking, how do i get in enough contact time, why not ask how much contact time do i need and how would that contact time be best used and broken up?

  2. Mr. Warlick-

    Could you kindly share with me a the information on the language service you mentioned? A link, or a name?

    By the way, we met last year at the ICE conference in Illinois. (I was on your tech support team.) Thank you again for incisive work.

  3. It may be a small point, but is what you said about KFC in China and New Zealand true?

    The only information I could find on the matter fails to reflect either the success you overwhelming success you mention or the rationale for it.

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3897717a13,00.html

    http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-06/01/content_335488.htm

    Blaming one fast food change on Maori obesity seems like folklore.

    Even if KFC is kicking butt overseas, what is so revolutionary about responding to local tastes? It just seems like business 101. Fast food chains change their menus across the USA in response to local preferences.

    ********

    Two thoughts on the Carnegie Unit…

    1) Like most other “official” policies related to education, the Carnegie Unit may be a lot more flexible than schools would like us to believe. The Carnegie Unit has become a heuristic, unquestioned by educators. Colleges and universities (with the possible exception of the University of California) are quite capable of coping with different metrics – ie… the success of homeschoolers in college.

    Schools need not be responsible for either college or vocational screening. Either practice undermines the educational mission.

    2) At its best, the Carnegie Unit creates academic diversity and encourages students to engage in a wide variety of learning experiences. It also forces schools to offer courses they might otherwise kill off.

  4. Gary,

    Good question about the KFC. The part about the business in China is direct from the presenter, Tom Welch. As for New Zealand, this was a conversation that I was having with educators in that country, who were talking about how KFC stores where designed to resemble Polynesian buildings. I don’t think that it was KFC alone that was being blamed for the increased obesity, but general efforts to export wester style foods and eating habits to these other cultures.

    Thanks for calling me on this!

    — dave —

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *