I spent about an hour and a half on a social network yesterday. It was probably the most time that I’ve spent on a single SN in my life — the most that I’ve been drawn in to the experience. I say that because I get the sense that this is what is supposed to happen — that you get drawn in. I’ve just visited again and found myself engaged in a discussion on the new Class Blogmeister group that was set up by Diane Scott. I also linked into Larry Anderson’s profile page from a search for Second Life among the network’s members. Cool page, Larry, by the way. When I saw that he had his Second Life avatar’s name on his page, I rushed back to my profile and added in my Twitter login and my Second Life name, Suriawang Dapto, along with a link to my virtual office there.
I’ve mentioned this in some of my presentations, that I do not believe that we – educators older than 30 (arbitrarily chosen age) – truly understand social networks yet. For instance, we’re trying to grow individual and independent social networks out of every discipline, school level, and just about any other probable community of educational interest. I’ll bet I’ve been contaced by e-mail or phone call by no fewer than ten people over the past month, each wanting me to see their social network. “This social network is going to revolutionize physical education!”
What strikes me is that our students make it work with just one. The three main choices, as far as I know, are MySpace, Bebo, and Facebook, the later seeming to be the one of choice at present. So why didn’t we figure out how to use Facebook as the social network for NECC. I looked there for a group for NECC. I probably won’t do that again :-/
So, anyway, I keep wondering about this. What’s the point, beyond costing time, which I guess many of our students have more to spend. It seems to me, that the true potential for all of this, and something that I don’t even think Facebook has truly captured yet, is the profile. What bothers me about social networks is that they have walls. It’s a weekness of Ning, in my opinion, that there do not seem to be easy and logical ways for us to connect to each other, based on common interests, regardless of the networks we’ve joined. There are certainly security issues. But for me to learn, to grow, to solve problems, and accomplish goals, I need to connect to people and resources that help me do that.
I guess I’m picturing social networks, whose boundaries become much more porous, and profiles, whose reach extends out into the Net in ways that attract connections based partly on how we populate our profiles, but also having certain aspects of our profiles populated automatically by what we are doing. There was a search tool out there, many years ago, called Kenjin [Feb 2000 PCWorld Review]. It would read the text from the active window on your PC screen, analyze the text, pick out the major themes, and then comb the Internet for links related to those subjects.
I wonder about a tool that would maintain a profile for us, based on how we’ve populated it, but also based on what we are doing with information. The profile would be fully customizable, the owner able to determine what would be public, what would be private, and what would be actionable in actively or passively connecting to other people and resources. Then temporary or permanent social networks could be created or create themselves around people of similar interests, concerns, problems, or goals.
This entry’s gotten to long already, but I’m continuing to try to hash this out.